<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:ref="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/reference/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.kgotsi.com/rss.rdf">
		<title>Kgotsi.com - Notes from life, IT, etc.</title>
		<link>http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php</link>
		<description><![CDATA[www.kgotsi.com]]></description>
		<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
				<rdf:li resource="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry100126-171242" />
				<rdf:li resource="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry090920-230101" />
				<rdf:li resource="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry080717-152210" />
				<rdf:li resource="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry080702-160207" />
				<rdf:li resource="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry080612-114923" />
				<rdf:li resource="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry080501-125556" />
				<rdf:li resource="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry080322-201845" />
				<rdf:li resource="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry070913-155654" />
				<rdf:li resource="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry070425-211813" />
				<rdf:li resource="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry070326-162814" />
			</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
	</channel>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry100126-171242">
		<title>When will RIM ever let the BlackBerry&#039;s every talk directly to Exchange?!</title>
		<link>http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry100126-171242</link>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just something that I feel the need to vent about. It works great with SBS 2003 (generally takes us 3 hours to get the first BlackBerry syncing with the BPS server). But with SBS 2008, the only way to do it is to have a 32-bit Server 2003 member server that takes care of the BPS needs. And this can be expensive. This has been an issue for over an year, and I think it is all the more reason not to use BlackBerries if you work in a Small Business environment. Exchange Activesync is pretty much a standard these days (for a licensing fee from M$). And there are plenty of phones out there that will talk directly to the Exchange 2007 (or 2003) server and sync up email, calendar, contacts, notes, tasks, etc OTA no problem, while keeping the advanced security requirements.<br /><br /><b>Other phones that do this well are:</b><br /><br />Windows Mobile phones<br />- iPhone<br />- Palm Palm OS<br />- Palm WebOS<br />- Android<br />- Any phone compatible with RoadSync (made by DataViz)<br />and the list goes on...<br /><br />Except for RIM&#039;s BlackBerry phones.<br /><br />RIM drives me crazy that they are unwilling to let their phones talk directly to the Exchange server. They just don&#039;t want to give up the revenue they get out of the BIS service and BES and BPS licenses....<br /><br />Aargh!!  :-)]]></description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry090920-230101">
		<title>Xen Server is still awesome</title>
		<link>http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry090920-230101</link>
		<description><![CDATA[They have since been bought out by Citrix, but I still really like their virtualization platform. I use it &amp; rely on it every day for my business. I currently have 5 virtual servers running on one Dell PowerEdge 1950 w/ quad-core Xeon 1.6Ghz CPU, running Citrix Xen Server 5.0. I am planning on upgrading to 5.5 soon so that I can use Debian Lenny as a guest VM OS. But first I want to get my NAS up via iSCSI, and a 2nd Xen Server physical host. This way I can move running VMs from one server to the other without incurring any downtime. This will allow maintenance during business hours, etc without any customer service disruption.<br /><br />This stuff is pretty sweet indeed.]]></description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry080717-152210">
		<title>XenServer Console messed up, then fixed</title>
		<link>http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry080717-152210</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, quite some time back I decided to make some adjustments to my Citrix XenServer to allow to have a subinterface (a.k.a. a second IP address) on the internal interface that I use for connecting to and managing it with XenCenter. This was only temporary while I was moving offices. Well after I finally moved the physical server to our new office I did everything that I could think of and find to reverse my initial changes so that everything dealing with the XenCenter management would be back to the defaults setup when XenServer 4.0 was installed. In addition to changing some of the system networking within the CentOS 5 host operating system, I also had to change some files that were specific to the XenServer and its admin connectivity. It took me forever to finally get it all back to normal. It wasn&#039;t too bad getting connectivity from XenCenter again, but after that I could never seem to get the console tab to actually show the console from any of the child servers, or the XenServer itself. I couldn&#039;t find anything on it on the internet. This kind of leads me to believe that most other admins have either been smart enough to not mess with some of the intracacies of the XenServer settings, or they were smart enough to note what they were so that they could reverse them, or they weren&#039;t smart enough to change them in the first place :-)<br /><br />In any case, the file /etc/issue needs to contain the IP address that the XenServer will be managed from using XenCenter. If not, the console functions in XenCenter don&#039;t work.<br /><br />At the same time that I modified the above file to reverse my original changes, I also removed the subinterface. So I&#039;m not positive which change fixed it. But the IP address listed in /etc/issue was the one that I had used temporarily on the subinterface, and I&#039;m pretty sure that I had modified that file, as it turned up in my list as one of the files that had been modified on the system since 1/1/08.<br /><br />So for any other XenServer sysadmins who may have fouled up access to the console function in XenCenter, I hope this helps you!<br /><br />Oh yeah. One more thing. After changing those settings, things didn&#039;t start working again until I restarted /etc/init.d/xenapi and /etc/init.d/xenapissl]]></description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry080702-160207">
		<title>Zimbabwe situation</title>
		<link>http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry080702-160207</link>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the first time I&#039;ve blogged about anything political or seriously important to humanity. But today I read a news artical called &quot;Why Zimbabwe? Why Now&quot; from MediaMonitors.net.<br /><br />The current Zimbabwe situation is something that I am very concerned about and have been following very closely. Their article seemed very inaccurate and I felt that it was unfair and wrong to the situation of Zimbabweans, so I took the opportunity to write the following letter to their editor. I feel that the information is good enough and important enough that it can be shared with all who are interested and should enlighten some, and confirm to others the things that we&#039;ve been hearing in the media.<br /><br /><b>The Letter:</b><br /><br />I just wanted to take an opportunity to let you know that I feel that the article on Zimbabwe posted today is largely misleading. I do not know whether this is due to intentional divisiveness of the writer, or his/her own ignorance. From November 2002-October 2004 I lived in South Africa and Botswana. I worked there as a voluntary missionary, paying my own way. I spent 99% of my time among the native indigenous Africans. I rarely even interacted with white people, so much so that when I returned home to America, it was quite a culture-shock for me to need to adjust to living among white people again.<br /><br />The people I associated with were generally the common middle to lower-class people of South Africa, Botswana and Zimbabwe. I also became very good friends with indigenous Africans from Kenya, Lesotho, Zimbabwe, Namibia and other parts of Africa. Some of these people had university degrees, others from technical colleges, and many were largely formally uneducated beyond Primary &amp; Secondary school (high school). I only mention this background to establish the fact that my experience &amp; knowledge came from Africans, and that it is about as authentic as it can get.<br /><br />Before going to South Africa, I’d known since I was a teenager that Zimbabwe was a country, although it would have taken me time to find it on the map. Now I know exactly where it is and much information about it. Again, this is all from my experiences in South Africa &amp; Botswana.<br /><br />It was first in South Africa that I heard about Robert Mugabe. By the time that I had arrived, he had already taken the farms from the white farmers and given them to people who didn’t know how to run the farms. At that time I had never heard whether he gave them to the original families owning the lands, or to his loyalists. The media I have seen since returning home has repeatedly stated that he gave them to his loyalists instead of the original owners whom he was supposed to give them to. I tend to believe this. In either case, at the time I arrived in South Africa the inflation of the Zim-Dollar was already such that it exchange rate to the South African Rand was 100 to 1 and to the US Dollar 1000 to 1. If nothing else, this should give some kind of indication that the current Zimbabwean government has done a very poor job to manage and help their economy. Throughout my stay in Southern Africa I continuously heard reports of things getting worse and worse there. This was often from Zimbabweans who were either my peer missionaries, or others who had migrated to South Africa and Botswana for work, since there wasn’t any in Zimbabwe.<br /><br />In South Africa, I heard reports that Mugabe was allowing the majority of the people of his country suffer in unemployment, hunger, &amp; poverty, while sharing his wealth with his select group of loyalists. In the recent media this has also been reported, including him printing excessive currency to distribute to them while there was no real monetary backing to it, thus fueling the inflation and causing his loyalists to prosper while the general Zimbabwean public was suffering. I tend to believe this media report as well.<br /><br />I knew a Botswana man who had recently returned from his own 2-year missionary service in Zimbabwe. He told us that there was regularly no bread on the shelves of the grocery stores in Zimbabwe.<br /><br />I can’t and won’t judge and say who is at fault with the whole Zimbabwe situation. But everyone I talked with who had first-hand experience with it, pointed to Mugabe and his regime. And perhaps we can give Mugabe the benefit of the doubt and say that he really is not behind it all, but is the “front” representative and is basically trapped in his political position as others in his party pressure him to stay in power to prevent their trial for crimes against humanity. I really can’t say.<br /><br />But what I do know is that your article seems quite inaccurate. I’d appreciate it if you removed it, modified it, or added my comments afterward in order to give a more balanced viewpoint.<br /><br />Particularly:<br />•	Zimbabwe’s sanctions from Western countries started coming after he kicked out the white farmers around early 2002, and started to let his people suffer.<br />•	Morgan Tsvangirai is criticized in your article as a Western stooge. The truth is that you and I have probably NEVER gone through and hopefully never will go through the brutal beatings, unjust jailing and terrible persecution that he has. It is a shame to slam the reputation of someone who only tries to be a leader of people who want change in his country. He has shunned violence and even rejected the proposal for African nations to bring in military force to balance Zimbabwe’s current militia, army and others who are currently a bit out of control. He does not want violence or his people to suffer. I honestly feel that it is quite pathetic to criticize someone like him.<br />•	Blaming the West is something that I NEVER heard from anyone who suffered from Zimbabwe’s problems. I heard them blame the West for other things. I had some Africans telling me that Americans were terrorists, especially in regards to the Iraq invasion. But never did the West come up in relation to Zimbabwe’s problems. Again, to my knowledge, the sanctions didn’t start coming until the Mugabe regime stopped taking care of the general public of Zimbabwe.<br /><br />So to answer the author’s question of Why Zimbabwe, I have to say that I certainly feel that their situation is deserving of our attention. I pray every morning and night that peace may come to the people of Zimbabwe in such a way that is for the good of all of the people. There are many problems in this world. And I think that there are many of them in which the U.S. and other Western countries are involved. I don’t mind at all that the problems of Zimbabwe are being considered by Western powers. They certainly need whatever help they can get at this point. They have the worst inflation rate in the world. Additionally, Western powers are not the only ones condemning the currently situation in Zimbabwe (including Mugabe’s regime and how the recent run-off election was carried out unfairly [not to mention the 1 month delay with producing the results from the initial election]). Botswana, Zimbabwe and Ghana are just a few African nations openly condemning all of this. And two of them are Zim’s neighbors. Many South Africans have recently condemned it. A clear indication of this was the refusal of South African port workers to allow Chinese arms to be undocked and shipped by truck through S.A. to Zimbabwe. They refused to allow such things, given the Mugabe’s violent election campaign. Also the G-8 recently publicly condemned the same Zimbabwe situation that you are defending. The G-8 includes USA, Japan, Britain, Germany, France, Russia, Italy and France.<br /><br />You’re going to have to do a lot more to convince me that things are anywhere close to “right” in Zimbabwe at this time. In the mean time, I hope and pray that things will get better there soon for the good of all of their people.<br /><br />Yours respectfully,<br />-<br />Doug Mortensen<br /><br />]]></description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry080612-114923">
		<title>Parallels Boot Camp woes</title>
		<link>http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry080612-114923</link>
		<description><![CDATA[So I use a Mac. I have used Macs for years. However, I hadn&#039;t owned one for about 4 years until Apple switched to Intel processors. Now we can run Windows natively on a Mac. Excellent. It&#039;s like 2 computers in one. And there are 2 ways that you can run Windows on a Mac. You can dual boot (Apple calls this feature Boot Camp). Or you can use virtualization software like Parallels or VMWare Fusion to run a virtual machine with Windows simultaneously along side the native Mac OS X.<br /><br />Then the virtualization people got creative and decided to let you virtualize your Boot Camp installation. This way if you dual boot and use virtualization, you only have to have 1 Windows installation.<br /><br />Simply put. This has botched my Windows Vista SP1 installation. It had been running beautifully using Boot Camp, and then I decided to try Parallels to access the Vista installation from Mac OS X without having to restart. Bad idea. about 4 working hours later, I still use my Windows programs under Boot Camp. Instead Microsoft sends me to an Internet Explorer only shell and tells me how to get a genuine copy of Windows.<br /><br />My business is a Microsoft partner. My copy of windows is genuine.<br /><br />Now I&#039;ve reactivated Windows Vista SP1 twice, rebooted between Mac OS X, Boot Camp and Vista in Parallels about 12 times. Updated Parallels to the newest version &amp; reinstalled their tools in Vista. And on and on.<br /><br />As convenient as a feature this virtualizing BootCamp may be, it is not worth the frustration &amp; lost productivity that occurs every time that Microsoft releases a major update.<br /><br />As soon as I get Vista happy again in Boot Camp, I&#039;m not using Parallels anymore to run the Boot Camp OS. Bad idea. Waste of 1/2 of a business day where I&#039;m supposed to be generating revenue helping clients with their networks and systems. Not nursing my own crippled Vista installation back to the land of trusted functionality....]]></description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry080501-125556">
		<title>SBS An error occurred while configuring a component error message when you run the Configure E-mail and Internet Connection Wizard in Windows Small Business Server 2003 fixed by enabling WMI Server</title>
		<link>http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry080501-125556</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought this one might be helpful to others. I got this error: &quot;An error occurred while configuring a component&quot;, running the Configure E-mail and Internet Connection Wizard on an SBS box for a client. Doing some googling, I came to MS KB ID #875421, which was actually for a different problem. But it did reference \Program Files\Microsoft Windows Small Business Server\Support\Icwlog.txt<br /><br />There I found the following two lines:<br /><br />Error 0x80070422 returned from call to WMIGetIPAddress().<br />Error 0x80070422 returned from call to CRFireCommit::Commit().<br /><br />And obviously the first one points to a problem obtaining the local IP address via WMI. So I looked at the services and sure enough WMI Service was stopped &amp; disabled. I think this was done either by myself or an employee in the past when troubleshooting some lock-ups. In any case, WMI Service is usually a good thing to have running (and by default it is always running). So I set the startup type back to automatic, started it up, reran the SBS CEACIC wizard, and ta-da!<br /><br />Problem fixed.]]></description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry080322-201845">
		<title>Fixed SUS 1.0 wouldn&#039;t uninstall</title>
		<link>http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry080322-201845</link>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is long overdue. Within a month of the previous post, I did fix the problem. I finally ended up being able to fix it, by first downloading from Microsoft the SUS 1.x installer, reinstalling it right on top of itself, and then the uninstall in add/remove programs finally worked. At that point I was able to upgrade the WSUS 2.0 install to 3.0.<br /><br />I don&#039;t know why I didn&#039;t try this earlier. I thought I did, but it didn&#039;t work. Maybe so, but I am not positive. In any case, it has been working well running WSUS 3.0 now for months.<br /><br />No thanks to Microsoft for making one of my original posts in their WSUS discussion group disappear. I honestly think that they removed it because they couldn&#039;t figure out an answer to it, and I was the only one person out of thousands of users who was having the problem. I&#039;ve seen this once before too. What gives? I was able to pull my original post up in the Google Groups cache of that Microsoft newsgroup. But in searching the actual microsoft group, it was nowhere to be found. This is the second time that I have seen such behavior. And the other time it was not with one of my own posts, but instead with a MS Office problem that several other people were reporting, in which they were kind of criticizing Microsoft, and for which Microsoft hadn&#039;t been able to provide a solution.<br /><br />I really hope that the disappearance of these threads was just a coincidence, but so far, it doesn&#039;t seem that way. In any case, it&#039;s pretty sad...]]></description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry070913-155654">
		<title>WSUS 3.0 won&#039;t install due to the presence of SUS 1.0, which won&#039;t uninstall</title>
		<link>http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry070913-155654</link>
		<description><![CDATA[I receive the following errors upon trying to uninstall SUS 1.0 (remember this machine currently also has WSUS 2.0 installed, although I don&#039;t know whether this makes any difference).<br /><br />First Error:<br />============<br />There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A  program required for this install to complete could not be run. Contact your support personell or package vendor.<br /><br />Second Error:<br />=============<br />Fatal error during installation<br /><br /><br />*Then the installer quits<br /><br />In the application log we find the following errors, which all occur within a few seconds of eachother:<br /><br />First Error: Event ID 1004 Source MsiInstaller<br />============<br />Detection of product &#039;{AFF0D9D3-6F0D-437E-9327-98108B4A8644}&#039;, feature &#039;WU&#039;, component &#039;{D31B2119-C240-4F8B-B13C-20EF38B2E070}&#039; failed.  The resource &#039;D:\SUS\wusync\WUSyncSvc.exe&#039; does not exist.<br /><br />Second Error: Event ID 1001 Source MsiInstaller<br />=============<br />Detection of product &#039;{AFF0D9D3-6F0D-437E-9327-98108B4A8644}&#039;, feature &#039;WU&#039; failed during request for component &#039;{D31B2119-C240-4F8B-B13C-20EF38B2E070}&#039;<br /><br />Third Error: Event ID 1004 Source MsiInstaller<br />============<br />Detection of product &#039;{AFF0D9D3-6F0D-437E-9327-98108B4A8644}&#039;, feature &#039;WU&#039;, component &#039;{D31B2119-C240-4F8B-B13C-20EF38B2E070}&#039; failed.  The resource &#039;D:\SUS\wusync\WUSyncSvc.exe&#039; does not exist.<br /><br />Fourth Error: Event ID 1001 Source MsiInstaller<br />=============<br />Detection of product &#039;{AFF0D9D3-6F0D-437E-9327-98108B4A8644}&#039;, feature &#039;WU&#039; failed during request for component &#039;{D31B2119-C240-4F8B-B13C-20EF38B2E070}&#039;<br /><br />Fifth Error: Event ID 1004 Source MsiInstaller<br />============<br />Detection of product &#039;{AFF0D9D3-6F0D-437E-9327-98108B4A8644}&#039;, feature &#039;WU&#039;, component &#039;{D31B2119-C240-4F8B-B13C-20EF38B2E070}&#039; failed.  The resource &#039;D:\SUS\wusync\WUSyncSvc.exe&#039; does not exist.<br /><br />Sixth Error: Event ID 1001 Source MsiInstaller<br />============<br />Detection of product &#039;{AFF0D9D3-6F0D-437E-9327-98108B4A8644}&#039;, feature &#039;WU&#039; failed during request for component &#039;{D31B2119-C240-4F8B-B13C-20EF38B2E070}&#039;<br /><br />Seventh Error: Event ID 1004 Source MsiInstaller<br />==============<br />Detection of product &#039;{AFF0D9D3-6F0D-437E-9327-98108B4A8644}&#039;, feature &#039;WU&#039;, component &#039;{D31B2119-C240-4F8B-B13C-20EF38B2E070}&#039; failed.  The resource &#039;D:\SUS\wusync\WUSyncSvc.exe&#039; does not exist.<br /><br />Eighth Error: Event ID 1001 Source MsiInstaller<br />=============<br />Detection of product &#039;{AFF0D9D3-6F0D-437E-9327-98108B4A8644}&#039;, feature &#039;WU&#039; failed during request for component &#039;{D31B2119-C240-4F8B-B13C-20EF38B2E070}&#039;<br /><br />Nineth Error: Event ID 11721 Source MsiInstaller<br />=============<br />Product: Microsoft Software Update Services -- Error 1721. There is a problem with this Windows Installer package. A program required for this install to complete could not be run. Contact your support personnel or package vendor. Action: WUSyncRemove, location: D:\SUS\wusync\WUSyncSvc.exe, command: /unregserver <br /><br />Tenth Error: Event ID 11725 Source MsiInstaller<br />=============<br />Product: Microsoft Software Update Services -- Removal failed.<br /><br />]]></description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry070425-211813">
		<title>Xen is better</title>
		<link>http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry070425-211813</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, after the 3.2 update, just about all of our problems were fixed. We applied it within the first week of April. But I think it may have introduced a new issue. We have a Windows Small Business Server 2003 Std R2 server that we use for VPN connections. It is a virtual machine on our XenExpress server. Ever since the update, we can no longer connect to other VMs on our XenExpress server over the VPN. We can connect to other systems in the office over the VPN, but not any other VMs on the XenExpress server. The VMs can communicate with eachother fine via IP. It just seems to be the VPN connections that are unable to communicate with the XenExpress VMs. I have looked at the firewalls and I don&#039;t think it is a firewall issue.<br /><br />Again, it seems that it was clearly introduced at the time that we upgraded from 3.1 to 3.2.<br /><br />We are VERY pleased with the XenExpress server overall, but this little issue would increase our productivity, and allow us to NOT move backward from the solutions and technology we&#039;ve been using. XenSource is of course a big leap forward in other ways. Did I mention that we like it??   :-)]]></description>
	</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry070326-162814">
		<title>Xen virtualization is pretty awesome....but a few problems??</title>
		<link>http://www.kgotsi.com/index.php?entry=entry070326-162814</link>
		<description><![CDATA[We are really enjoying using XenExpress on our new Dell PowerEdge 1950 Quad-core Xeon. It&#039;s extremely fast now with 4 virtual servers running on our Xen server. I am ready to plop down the $700.00 to purchase the XenEnterprise version, which will allow us to have unlimited VMs, but before I do, I need answeres to few problems we&#039;ve experienced.<br /><br />1.) Xen Virtual Machine crash - We have 2 linux VMs running Debian Sarge, and 2 Windows VMs, one running Windows Small Business Server 2003 Premium R2, and the other running Server 2003 R2. I use a Mac, and so I connect to the Server 2003 R2 VM via RDP to do a lot of Windows work. One of the things that I do there is administer the Xen server. We have the Xen Administration program loaded onto that VM. It generally works fine administering the VMs that way. However, about an hour ago I was logged onto our Server 2003 R2 machine and running the Xen Administration program, when suddenly my RDP session stopped working. I reconnected about a minute later, only to find that the VM had rebooted. Just a moment later, a colleauge mentioned that the other Windows VM had just restarted unexpectedly. Upon logging back into both, we were prompted with Microsoft&#039;s window which asks why the computer was unexpectedly shut down. I then logged into the linux VMs, and ran the uptime command to find that one reported being up for over 4 days, and the other over 5 days. So only the Windows servers were rebooted. I SSH&#039;d into the Xen Server &amp; checked out the /var/log/messages &amp; /var/log/xen/xend.log log files, as well as others that I thought may give helpful information. Those two were the only ones that really seemed to tell much about the unexpected Xen problem. I have a pretty good hunch as to what caused the problem with the server I was using (Server 2003 Standard R2), but I have no idea why it took the 2nd Windows server down with it. (By the way, the VMs are running fine now).<br /><br />Here&#039;s exactly what I was doing at the time of the VM crashes:<br />I was connected to the Windows Server 2003 Standard R2 via RDP on the console connection. And I think the console fact is the important one here. The reason being is because the last thing I did before the servers crashed was open the Xen Administration program, select the Server 2003 Std R2 VM from the list in the upper-pane, then click on the &quot;Graphical Console&quot; tab down below. I am thinking that because I was remotely connected to the server&#039;s graphical console via RDP, the Xen Administration program didn&#039;t like the idea of me viewing the graphical console from it, from within the graphical console. I&#039;ve had similar issues w/ VNC connecting to the local host, only to get an endless loop of embedded screens. Hmmm. This is absolutely the only reason why I can imagine that this happened.<br /><br />So, perhaps for now, a lesson learned is to be more careful with that. But perhaps in the meantime, XenSource can implement an if-then statement in their software to check before hand as to whether allowing their software to do something (try to do, anyway) is going to cause problems.<br /><br />I think the big problem here however, is that my 2nd Windows VM was taken down with the other. I think this is totally unacceptable. Just a passing detail that may help in solving this problem is that one or two other times, I have had problems connecting to the Xen server from the Xen Administration program, so I SSH&#039;d into the Xen server &amp; restarted the XenAgentD process (service xenagentd restart), only to find that it also killed &amp; restarted my Windows VMs unexpectedly, while leaving the linux VMs unscathed.<br /><br />As previously stated, I am ready to pay the $700.00 for XenEnterprise, but not until I get a good answer to what caused this, and get a permanent fix.<br /><br />As far as I am concerned, I am very excited about Xen. I love to see Open Source software actually make some money and develop into a strong competing business to proprietary software companies. That is why I chose Xen over VMWare for virualization.<br />I don&#039;t think that most people using Xen have problems like this. The very fact that Xen is marketed &amp; often reviewed as a strong competitor to VMWare all the more confirms to me that this is probably not a common problem. Also, the founder of XenSource (Ian Pratt), stated in July 2006 that there were very few outstanding bugs in Xen at that time (this was in a PDF titled &quot;The Xen Roadmap&quot;). And I&#039;m thinking that coming from this guy being a very experienced professional programmer, this probably refers to issues that are so small that I probably wouldn&#039;t even notice them (although I may be overzealous here).<br />Also, HP and I think IBM are strongly backing Xen, and sell servers preloaded with it. HP has published whitepapers in conjunction with XenSource stating how great Xen is and posting benchmarks running on their systems. I really don&#039;t think they would do this, if my problems were commonly experienced.<br /><br />So what I&#039;m trying to say is that I don&#039;t think that Xen is a buggy solution that shouldn&#039;t be used on production servers. We&#039;ve actually been very, very impressed with it overall. But there is obviously something wrong here, and I need to be reassured that we&#039;re making the right decision by virtualizing with Xen, before I commit to invest in it. And once that we really are convinced that it is the right way to go, we will continue to invest in it, and work to steer our clients the same way. Once that we commit ourselves, then we want them to be successful, and so will gladly pay them in doing our part to help them have the financial resources needed to continue to improve &amp; be successful.<br /><br />As for now, I am posting this with a request for help. I have placed the relevant portions of the log files here:  <a href="http://www.kgotsi.com/static.php?page=static-xen-logs-20070326" target="_blank" >http://www.kgotsi.com/static.php?page=s ... s-20070326</a><br /><br />Please provide assistance, and also contact someone in the Xen sales division and let them know that you are sending them another buyer, whose problems you just fixed.<br /><br />Thanks a lot!<br /><br />--<br />Doug Mortensen<br />Network Consultant<br />Impala Networks Inc.<br />doug----at----impalanetworks----dot----com<br /><br />CCNA, MCP, A+, Linux+, MS Small Business Specialist<br />]]></description>
	</item>
</rdf:RDF>

